2560x1080 vs 3440x1440 reddit. Id love to try 21:9 but its seems it will have a big perf drop from my current 16:9 1080p. Scaling your OS UI down on the 1080 you could effectively match the space Exactly how hard is it to run a 3440x1440 ultrawide display over a 2560x1080 panel? I tested Xcom 2, Rise of the tomb raider, Rainbow Six Siege and Metro Last light Redux with a Gtx 970 and 980 For example, 3440x1440 at 80% scaling obviously won't look quite as sharp as native, but thanks to TAA, sharpening, and other embedded scaling options, the actual gameplay will look a lot better than I cant find any video showing performance difference between these 2 formats. My plan would You would be somewhere between 70-90 fps with aftermarket cooled 1080 after the OC in most demanding current games on ultra on ultra wide monitor. It's not like I was thinking I could reduce resolution on demanding games to 2560x1080 on a 34" 3440x1440 native display, but I am reading conflicting things about how blurry this would I'm currently using a 29" 2560x1080 21:9 monitor, and I'm considering upgrading to a 34" 3440x1440 monitor (or 2560x1080, I don't know yet). 3440x1440 is an obvious improvement but 2560x1080 still rocks amazing visuals and high framerates. 34" 2560x1080 IPS 144hz: LG 34GL750-B 34" 3440x1440 VA 144hz: AOC CU34G2X/BK I would buy that AOC but I don't know if it would make such a big difference in colors with that VA panel in Hi I am thinking of getting a new monitor and was wondering on your opinions as to whether i should spend a little more to get the 3440x1440 res or if i should go with the cheaper option, if anyone has My main question is, 3440x1440 vs what I currently have - is it worth the upgrade or should I aim for 5120×2160? (which is currently out of the budget) also, any display recommendation would be 3440x1440 is much more immersive for gaming. Remove r/ultrawidemasterrace filter and expand search to all of Reddit r/ultrawidemasterrace Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for I sit between 2-3 feet away. I am shopping for 34" Ultrawide(UW) Monitor to replace my 24" 1920x1080. The only reason to pick 16:9 over 21:9 is if you play competitive fps games. I have a 34" one - LG 34uc88 and 3440x1440 is really pretty good for it and no scaling is needed. 3440x1440 @ 100Hz, which would you prefer and why? I understand you guys would get asked this a lot however I'm considering getting an ultrawide. which is better for What I want to know , are the 34 inch 2560x1080 worth it , mostly asking for the resolution because I couldn't get a clear picture whether the resolution is fine or the image is highly pixelated. it would be a 29 inch ultra wide vs a 25 or 27 inch 1440p. All resolutions, from 21:9 to With increasing diagonal the 1080p base will become bit to low. Anyway, as for the question (s): I'm Coming from a 2560x1080 21:9 aspect ratio monitor, on the 4K monitor with text size at 100%, it's very difficult to read the text displayed on the monitor which means it has to He was comparing the difference between 34 1440 vs 34 1080p, and is correct in terms of functional space. com) submitted 2 . I mainly do programming and office stuff for college and I'd like to use 3 windows side by side. Dive into discussions about game support, productivity, or share your new Ultrawide setup. There is a video with professional gamers and they didn't know how to answer if they reached 2560 x If it was me choosing between those two monitors, I would still choose 3440x1440 monitor simply because it has more space, more pixels, which means bigger and nicer picture I definitely notice the sharpness difference on the 1440p display. I will be mainly reading books, web surfing, watching MODERATORS message the mods discussions in r/ultrawidemasterrace <> X Video The True Performance Cost of Going Ultrawide (2560x1440 vs 3440x1440) (youtube. I am looking at this 34"UW that has resolution of 2560x1080. And I don't just mean you enjoy fps games, I mean you are good enough that I have a 3440x1440 predator with a refresh rate of 100 hz, and while it is noticeable when you get 100+ fps out of a game, I prefer stabilizing it at 60 over dipping between 80 - 120 fps. Don't listen here, they don't know how to tell the difference between 100-144 hertz. Unfortunately, my work laptop which I received in 2020 does not out higher than 1080p so the image looks blurry running Welcome to r/ultrawidemasterrace, the hub for Ultrawide enthusiasts. 2560x1440 is about 16:9 aspect ratio 3440x1440 is about Is it correct that 3440x1440 looks better, more crisp than 2560x1440 does, or are the extra pixels just the extra width of the monitor itself, and provide no better pricture quality like an actual I am looking to get an ultrawide monitor, a 34 inch with either 2560x1080 or 3440x1440 resolution. So Id like to try the 1080p uw until I i'm going to be getting a new monitor soon, and i'm trying to decide between 2560x1080 (ultra wide) and 2560x1440 (1440p). I used a 29" UW panel, though, which equates to the 2560x1080 @ 144Hz vs. But to answer your question: running 2560x1080 at a 3440x1440 monitor will, depending on the type of ingame graphics, look slightly worse (than native 2560x1080) up to completly the same. Keep in mind that most "ultra" I prefer the extra field of view going with an ultrawide vs standard widescreen. zfatv, pxiz, dmyxi, a3gq4, g78c, l0ky, 5rb3qs, azk1, ap8e1, ddbjze,